中国德迷联盟 - GerFans.cn

 找回密码
 加入联盟

手机号码,快捷登录

Devolution in Spain - A nationality, not a nation

[复制链接]
seitmeister 发表于 2010-7-7 16:49:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
(The Economist, July 1st 2010, http://www.economist.com/node/16 ... =scn/fb/wl/ar/spain)

A nationality, not a nation
The constitutional court limits Catalonia’s powers
Jul 1st 2010 | Madrid

FOR a decision that took four years to reach, the rewriting of Catalonia’s controversial autonomy charter ordered by Spain’s constitutional court on June 28th was surprisingly light-handed. The judges struck out parts of just 14 of the charter’s 223 articles. A further 27 will be constrained by still-unpublished written interpretations.

The court reined in attempts to promote Catalan as the senior of the region’s two official languages, above Castilian Spanish, and took away powers over local judges. A hairsplitting decision allowed Catalans to continue claiming they belonged to a nation, while stating that the claim had no legal worth. The constitution ambiguously labels regions like Catalonia as “nationalities”, but it still recognises only one nation, Spain.

Catalonia’s politicians had stored away so much pent-up fury at the court’s long-awaited decision, however, that they duly exploded. “The constitutional pact has reached its limits,” blasted Artur Mas, of Convergence and Union, a nationalist coalition. Separatists predicted a surge in support for an independent Catalonia. José Montilla, the Socialist who runs a three-way coalition government in Catalonia, called for street protests on July 10th.

There is much hot air in such outrage. Catalonia, which already enjoys a large dose of devolution, has an election in the autumn. Nationalists and separatists in the populous and wealthy region typically seek votes by casting themselves as victims of the central government and courts in Madrid. That said, there are some grounds for justified complaint—principally that Catalans approved the charter in a referendum, and the court has overturned their vote.

Even before the sentence was passed, however, Spain appeared to have reached the high-water mark of devolution. The centre-right opposition People’s Party, which challenged the Catalan charter in court, has long felt so. Even José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, the Socialist prime minister, who backed the charter and won the grateful support of Catalan voters in the 2008 general election, has signalled that the latest phase of devolution is drawing to a close. Spain, he says, has “concluded the phase of self-government” and should devise ways for its 17 regions to co-operate better.

Recentralising some functions might be a way to control Spain’s soaring budget deficit, 11.2% of GDP in 2009. Regional governments’ debts grew by 28%, year-on-year, in the first quarter. Some regions, including Catalonia, will raise income tax. Come the autumn, Catalan politicians may find voters more worried about taxes and public services than about the trimming of their still-generous charter on autonomy.


[s:105]
18181818 发表于 2010-7-7 16:51:42 | 显示全部楼层
好!看不懂!
德迷小天王 发表于 2010-7-7 16:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
英文不行了,翻译一哈
发丘中郎将兼摸 发表于 2010-7-7 16:56:49 | 显示全部楼层
Spain the best by far – they will probably fail


By Simon Kuper

Published: June 15 2010 17:56 | Last updated: June 15 2010 17:56

On a freezing Parisian night this March, Spain popped over for a friendly and tore France apart. Without particularly trying, they won 2-0. Most of the time they passed the ball around as if playing piggy-in-the-middle with the Frenchmen.

France’s striker Nicolas Anelka said afterwards that it had looked like a first-division club playing a fourth-division one, but in truth it was worse than that.

When Spain meet Switzerland in Durban on Wednesday, the best team in the world face the most boring team. Rightly, Spain are the bookmakers’ favourites to win the trophy. Nonetheless they will probably fail, because in World Cups the best team usually does.

Spain’s first problem is that everyone knows exactly how they play. They methodically weave their way down the pitch with short passes, and score. They are so confident in their style that they shun the orthodoxy of modern football, which says that the best way to score is on a fast break.

When Spain win possession, they seldom bother breaking. They just methodically weave.

The problem they posed was always clear, yet for years nobody could solve it. Since 2000 Spain have won more than 70 per cent of their matches, better than even Brazil have ever managed in a decade. Statistically they are the best team in history.

Inevitably it was José Mourinho, the coach who likes to say that he throws sugar in the other team’s fuel tank, who seems to have cracked Spain’s code. This spring his Inter Milan twice played Barcelona, a team including about half the Spanish national team. Mourinho, in his own jargon, “parked the bus” in Barcelona’s stadium: virtually his entire team lined up in moving rows at the edge of their own penalty area.

Barca were allowed to do what they liked until they reached Inter’s wall, whereupon they were crowded out.

And Mourinho had a second innovation. He had seen that Xavi – the hub for Barca as he is for Spain – is a weakness as well as a strength.

One reason Xavi’s team-mates can always get the ball to him is that he doesn’t always have to defend. That’s a rare privilege for a midfielder in modern football. Inter duly ran counter-attacks through the space that Xavi left them, and slayed Barcelona. Every team in Spain’s group will have performed an exegesis of those two games.

However, Spain’s biggest problem is the World Cup’s format. Pre-tournament, pundits tend to presume that the best team will win. France and Argentina, for instance, have been written off on the grounds that they aren’t the best team. Yet the pundits are confusing World Cups with leagues. In a league the best team does win, because a league lasts nine months. Over such a long period, random factors like one referee’s error or a ball on the post are rarely decisive. In a league, quality tells.

In contrast, a World Cup is decided in four games. Almost every big team will reach the second round. After that, whoever wins four times is the champion.

Most of the knockout games will be decided by one goal or penalties. A referee’s error or a random element, a ball hitting the post rather than the back of the net, therefore can – and often does – decide the World Cup.

Luck of the draw matters too: if either Spain or Brazil somehow fail to win their group, they could meet in the second round – thereby opening the way to a second-rank side such as France or Argentina.

If this tournament were simply about deciding who is the best side, the Spaniards could swing round Fifa’s offices and pick up the trophy now. Instead, to use an analogy chosen entirely at random, Spain will probably default.
那村的鸟儿 发表于 2010-7-7 16:57:08 | 显示全部楼层
[s:107]

热,看不懂
想念于大川老师 发表于 2010-7-7 17:40:37 | 显示全部楼层
静!看不懂
日耳曼霸权 发表于 2010-7-7 17:50:30 | 显示全部楼层
LZ又谈政治,这和比赛没多大关系吧,加泰罗尼亚人会反水?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入联盟

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|中国德迷联盟 - GerFans.cn ( 辽ICP备17002255号 )|网站地图

GMT+8, 2025-7-16 02:07 , Processed in 0.032181 second(s), 10 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表